Low-cost airlines have revolutionized travel in Albania, making it easier for more people to explore foreign lands or indulge in frequent getaways. However, as these airlines have gained popularity, their fares have taken a surprising turn. What once seemed like a pocket-friendly option has left customers like me with raised eyebrows and diminishing savings. With my and my friends recent trips with low cost airlines I have noticed that the low cost stand for them, and not for you as a customer. Allow me to share my recent experience with low-cost airlines and why they might not be the budget-friendly choice they claim to be.
1. Not as Cheap as They Used to Be:
Low-cost airlines entered the market with enticingly low prices, but as their market share grew, so did their fares. Compared to traditional airlines, their cost advantage has dwindled over time, and securing a fantastic deal with a regular carrier is now a common occurrence, especially if you’re flexible with your travel dates.
2. Inconvenient Airports:
To keep their costs down, low-cost airlines often opt for smaller, less-equipped airports situated far from the actual destination. This choice comes with a hefty price for customers, as they have to bear additional commuting expenses and endure longer travel times. Take my recent trip to Sweden, for instance. After landing at 9 pm, I found myself stuck at a poorly serviced airport until midnight due to slow passport clearance. Many people in Albania (including me) choose these airlines because they offer direct flights. Well guess what, if you have to take a train for more than 1 hour, it’s not a direct flight. You’re just taking a train or bus instead of another plane.
3. Hidden Logistic Costs:
Although my initial trip to Sweden seemed affordable at 220€, the additional expenses soon piled up. From a 7€ fare to reach my accommodation in the nearby town of Nykoping, since I managed to get out of the airport 3 hours later than expected, to a 13€ train ride to Stockholm, and a 22€ bus back to the airport, my total costs amounted to 262€. These expenses, often overlooked, contribute significantly to the true cost of budget travel.
4. Time-Consuming Delays:
Low-cost airlines have a reputation for potential flight delays, and my return journey was no exception. A 4.5-hour delay turned my travel time into a grueling 16 hours, adding stress and frustration to an otherwise exciting adventure. And to make matters worse, the meal voucher provided for the inconvenience only covered a paltry 4€, barely enough for a coffe (not even a machiato) beverage at the small airport in Sweden.
5. Stressful Luggage Policy:
As if delays and expenses weren’t enough, low-cost airlines enforce strict luggage policies, allowing only one backpack or carry-on item. This limitation can be particularly taxing for travelers exploring new cities, as it hinders the ability to shop or carry additional items. No extra purse, no extra laptop bag or camera bag, you need to fit all in one backpack. If you’re walking around the city and see something nice to buy, ohhh girl, you really need to think hard if you can fitt it in your curren luggage. While you can purchase extra bags for 15€, which for a two way flight is double, this adds to the overall cost, and acquiring luggage at the destination may not always be a practical solution. The total cost in my case would have been 292€.
In conclusion, low-cost airlines might still suit some travellers, especially those with specific travel schedules & destination. However, it’s essential to be aware of the hidden costs, time-consuming delays, and luggage restrictions that come with budget travel. Before booking a flight, consider the total cost, convenience of airports, and potential for delays. For some, paying a bit more for a ticket with a traditional airline may provide a stress-free and seamless journey that is worth the extra investment to skip all the drama.
